Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OfficeSIP Server


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

OfficeSIP Server

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article and related article OfficeSIP Messenger have been continuously added (without improvement) by users after being deleted as spam - new users appear after prior user had been warned and then blocked by admin User talk:Piseciffo for spamming activities. Calltech (talk) 12:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Comment: The current version doesn't read as spam, and no actual argument has been made any argument for deletion. If you want it deleted, I suggest you comment on its notability rather than the person/people who created it. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The arguments for deletion were already made during prior deletions. The fact that the article is simply recreated by a "new" user without improvement is argument alone for deletion. Calltech (talk) 09:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Um, the article has never been up for AfD before and the 1 other deletion was a speedy of a completely different version of the article. I find the fact that you are attempting to justify your non-reason for deletion by saying it was created by a new user to be disgusting.  FYI, most new articles and most other content contribution is done by new users and IPs. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Your disgust is misplaced and perhaps you need to chill out. The facts are that the article was removed several times and the user who was spamming was blocked - then a "new" user with a new ID just happens to pop up and immediately adds this very non-notable article again.  This was not coincidental.  Calltech (talk) 18:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Your the one who chose to respond to a request for a valid reason with another non-reason. And both the deleted content & the public log disagrees with your assessment of the situation.  Perhaps next time you could avoid this argument simply by supplying a real deletion reason, i.e. something like those that others have supplied below. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. This debate was never transcluded. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are hundreds of websites that provide free downloads but they all just reproduce the blurb from OfficeSIP Communications. I can't find any serious independent discussion of the product. Just chat. There is nothing on the product or company in News or Books. All I could find is that they are located in Taganrog, Russia. No clue about their business model. No independent sources to show notability. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to locate any reliable source coverage. --Cyber cobra (talk) 07:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.