Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OfficeYes.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus  DGG ( talk ) 09:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

OfficeYes.com
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Nothing significant but another company. For being in Wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a Startup directory. Definitely getting funded by VC, and building Wikipedia page for their publicity, releasing articles on major media as paid or influenced. Light2021 (talk) 10:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; an advertorial on an unremarkable e-commerce company. The size of the investment suggests that it's a minor player in its space. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have added a link above to the 2013 no-consensus AfD. AllyD (talk) 07:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: My own view in the 2013 AfD was that all that was available was coverage on the propositional opportunity on which the company had been founded and obtained start-up funding. It should be noted though that others were strongly of another view. Reviewing the coverage of this firm, I have been surprised to see so little since that initial start-up coverage; searches using the tailored Indian search are finding little other than passing mention relative to Holisol, who provide the back-end logistics for this and other e-comm firms . Now as in 2013, I fail to see the in-depth critical discussion needed to demonstrate encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 07:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.