Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office of the Procurement Ombudsman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Office of the Procurement Ombudsman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Relatively minor Indian government bureau. Entirely based on first party sources.  DGG ( talk ) 22:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 13:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment – I assume you mean "Canadian government"? Graham (talk) 04:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to recreation based on reliable sources. In addition to it being based entirely on primary sources, there's some problematic close paraphrasing, too. There are some sources, but I'm not seeing quite enough to feel sufficiently confident in its notability to try to make improvements. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 13:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can find reliable source coverage in media to support it; primary sources like these are not how a government department gets a standalone Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 18:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.