Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office space planning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 01:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Office space planning

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a guide per WP:GAMEGUIDE JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Sidpickle (talk) 15:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I did edit this article at some stage and have no problem if it is judged to be non-compliant and removed. However, it attracts approximately 13,000 hits per year, so it appears there is need for some form of information on the subject.  There are also links from this to 8 other articles on Wikipedia and these could lose readership potential if and when it is removed.
 * Keep, though I'm quite surprised there isn't a general Space planning article on Wikipedia. However, there are publications available about Office space planning, which could potentially be used to create a reasonable Wikipedia overview. Unfortunately the current version reads rather like a piece of WP:OR based on original legislation. Sionk (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I think an article is needed about this subject. There is considerable OR in the article but it still passes WP:GNG. A maintenance tag is enough...Rameshnta909 (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.