Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Official


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus, defaults to keep - Liberatore(T) 18:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Official
This should be transwikied to Wiktionary Nippoo 10:04, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * A wiktionary article may be a good idea, but deleting it from Wikipedia is crazy- at the very least the uses in churches and competitions can be made into proper article (section)s. Fastifex 12:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but cleanup a lot. This seems to be much more than a Wiktionary entry. --Deville (Talk) 15:11, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as overgrown dictionary definition. Brian G. Crawford 16:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, and elaborate major section(s) or (ultimately) turn into disambig Juvis 16:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Wiktionary. Good dictionary entry but not for wp (WP:WINAD). -- P199 18:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Deville. Stifle 22:45, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.