Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogden Gavanski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  09:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Ogden Gavanski

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. Claim to notability seems to be WP:CREATIVE but no indication that he played a major role in any production cited. Actual article is heavily promotional. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * He's been a supervising producer, worked on the Chucky franchise, won a Canadian award for his film with Pedro Aldomovar, co-produced with Lions Gate Entertainment, worked with Hollywood stars, etc. For Canada, that's notable. Abonzz (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't doubt any of what you write. However the notability guidelines, WP:CREATIVE don't make any sort country based consideration (vs some of the NSPORT guidelines which treat some things differently from different countries). That's why I wrote "he played a major role" since that's the standard the criteria is aiming for. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * (talk) Barkeep49 For producing the Chucky franchise, couldn't he fall under the following notability criteria"The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work." There are about seven films in the franchise. Thanks! Abonzz (talk) 13:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigmamsg 23:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep (talk) He is notable in Canada for having won a local award and having produced notable films. Also his work on the Chucky movie franchise fits the notability criteria for co-creating a collective body of work. Abonzz (talk) 13:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep He's notable not only in Canada but internationally for his work with US studios such as Lions Gate and Universal. His film "My Life Without Me" did not only get Canadian awards (Leo and Genie) but was also nominated for a number of Goya awards and won some (see the Wikipedia page).  As well, it was in official competition at the Berlin Film festival. This film was co-produced by his company (Milestone) and Almodovar's (el Deseo). As the producer on a number of successful independent and studio films including Cult of Chucky, he definitely played a "major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work."  A "producer" oversees the entire production, including creative and financial. User: Yeftini Veetz  —Preceding undated comment added 14:33, 29 May 2018 (UTC)  —  has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Not only did he produce one of the most successful and highly rated chapters of the Chucky franchise, he's also been tapped by Universal to produce the latest movie in their Doom franchise (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0310452/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1).  User: Yeftini Veetz  —Preceding undated comment added 13:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)  Ambox warning pn.svg — Duplicate vote: Yeftini Veetz (talk • contribs)  has already cast a vote above.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.