Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogenna Ekwubiri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Ogenna Ekwubiri

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP of a model who has won non notable titles, sourced to various promotional pieces. Mccapra (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete — I think this is one of the three times has violated their topic ban on biographical articles thus far (I’m not so sure though) I do know MER-C blocked them for violating their Tban sometime in the past. If I’m not mistaken this was one of the articles  & I  flagged as “possible spam” again I can’t really remember the details due to the fact they Nnadigoodluck “cleans up” his TP's manually and too often I might add.  In any case there has been an extensive discussion on if or not the current parameters for accessing the notability standards for models are beneficial or counter productive, following the current parameters, this doesn’t seem to scale through. Furthermore sources used in the article largely   fall under “churnalism” Having said I note at least two sources there seem to be accurate, however not enough. A WP:BASIC argument could have been made here but I see too many “mere announcements” for anything cogent to come out of that. FWIW, I’d initiate a site wide RFC on if the parameters for accessing models ought to be changed. Celestina007 (talk) 14:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think there is any reasonable way to say that her awards are ones that imply notability ., is my impression right that the newspapers and magazines listed don't really count as major sources?  DGG ( talk ) 00:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.