Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oghma (Magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Oghma (Magazine)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nothing to indicate that this former journal was notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Keep It has an entry in this specialist encyclopedia, for starters. Zagalejo^^^ 23:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. A google search turned up very few related hits in the first several pages. In fact, the gbooks link provided above might be the only one. I don't think that one paragraph blurb alone establishes notability or qualifies this article for inclusion. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * There are other brief mentions here and there., . I realize there's not much, but the Irish language doesn't have a strong web presence. Zagalejo^^^ 07:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Try paper sources too. You don't need a web presence to write a good article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep The above-mentioned specialist encyclopedia was cited several times and written by an expert of Celtic culture. - Mgm|(talk) 11:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If the current version is not satisfactory, please userfy to me or Zafalejo if he wants it with a talk page note. I'd be happy to expand. - Mgm|(talk) 11:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Lack of google hits for something that ceased to exists in 1998 is not unusual. I think a bare notability is established by the fact that an encyclopedia of Celtic Culture saw fit to include this defunct journal, and the article should be allowed to stand and grow (it was created 8 days ago - give it a chance).  Given that the journal was published in a language other than English further argues for its survival on the English encyclopedia.  Scarykitty (talk) 02:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.