Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogive of Luxembourg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Ogive of Luxembourg

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject is not notable. The article serves as a genealogical entry, linking her father (also of dubious notability) to her husband, but Wikipedia is not a genealogy database. The cited source, as well as all sources I could find, are genealogy publications. Being mentioned in a family tree does not translate to significant coverage. Surtsicna (talk) 08:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 08:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 08:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 08:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 08:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 08:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm not sure for this historical figure from Luxembourg. Other language wiki articles have a bit more info it:Ogiva di Lussemburgo. Need attention from Luxembourg native editors. VocalIndia (talk) 10:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * She seem like a important historical figure from the time of Middle Ages. However, source of Luxembourg is extremely weak, and the number of Luxembourg language editors is very tiny. We should be slow to delete any of it. VocalIndia (talk) 10:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * it:Ogiva di Lussemburgo gives a long list of who she was related to and what those people did. There is nothing about her specifically. The lack of significant coverage in reliable sources indicates that she is really not an important historical figure. Surtsicna (talk) 12:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. While searching for sources I ran across another figure who does appear to be notable, Ogive, receiver of the lardarium of Kortrijk, but she appears to have lived somewhat later: 1187. pburka (talk) 00:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've done quite a bit of searching, but I still can find nothing but trivial (mostly genealogical) mentions in the context of some other more important figure. Wikipedia is not genealogy, and this person can't inherit notability from her notable relatives. Unless we're all missing something, there is no substantial coverage of her specifically, and so she fails the GNG. I'm glad to reëvaluate if more sources are found. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.