Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogun Erdem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Ogun Erdem

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was No indication this person has received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. This remains valid, as agents are not generally notable. PROD was contested on the grounds that sources had been added. However, these do not amount to significant coverage, in my opinion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 19:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG as none of the references which are reliable sources provide significant coverage. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 19:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no indication that this individual has been the subject of significant reliable coverage in himself. The players he represents may be notable and individual transfers as a piece of business may have generated significant media attention, but I see nothing on the individual himself, he is only tangentially associated with notable acts. Fenix down (talk) 16:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 21:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.