Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohh Nooo! Mr. Bill Presents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mr. Bill. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Ohh Nooo! Mr. Bill Presents

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deprodded with "obviously notable", but I couldn't find any sources. No relevant results on ProQuest, just TV guide listings. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Entertainment,  and California.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. The entry in Encyclopedia of Television Shows, 1925 through 2010 is descriptive (100% plot summary plus production details) and pretty much a catalogue-like entry (just like ours). WP:GNG (and Notability (media)) equires that wider significance is shown, and while inclusion in catalogue-like encyclopedis is something, I don't think such a short mention is sufficient for WP:SIGCOV. It is better than a passing mention in half a sentence, but IMHO, without even a sentence of analysis that this work was important or significant somehow, at best it can be mentioned in some list or in creator's bio or such. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge to Mr. Bill. Keep, a well-known repeated sketch of the early SNL shows, there is no reason to consider removing the page. On and on go these noms of popular culture icons. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:ITSNOTABLE is not a valid argument. Try again. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Trying to Keep major and popular articles which are nommed day after day is a valid argument for us nonwikilawyers. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * What is there to keep here? So little of the content is sourced. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, struck it. I didn't know there was an entire article on Mr. Bill, where this should be redirected. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.