Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohmefentanyl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete per author request and arguably as attack page. All right: Nuklear is the only author of the article, they now request its deletion, and that is probably for the better. Given the weird nonsense they are now posting here and in the article ("The founder of Hochemicals© is the overall master of the totalitarian dictatorship regime"), the content is probably not exactly reliable. Someone else may of course write a new article about this topic. Sandstein 17:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Ohmefentanyl
Delete it. The generalized totalitarian dictator leader, the Führer himself) is creating his own webdomain. Such classified topics should not be available on a *public* website.--Nuklear 14:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Infact I was on a secure line with the ambassador to the U.S. thismorning and he suggested this to me.


 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page is mostly the result of one editors work having first been built 13:38, 6 October 2006 by user:Nuklear, who has now made 984 of the users total 1118 edits to this article. At first glance it looks like a well referenced article on a topic that you know nothing about. Further reading brings statements like *The founder of Hochemicals is the generalized master of the totalitarian dictaorship regime. which the just yesterday was changed to *The founder of Hochemicals is the generalized master of the totalitarian dictatorship regime. by user:Nuklear  the article does contain some information that is correct and can be validated easily in Google as Ohmefentanyl really is a synthetic opioid   Some Google results on (totally synthetic opioid Ohmefentanyl) are "interesting" to say the least. I placed a on the editors talk page yesterday  I could not find a proper place in Vandalism to bring this, and the article would appear to be a candidate for WP:AfD so I bring it here. Jeepday 14:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

What are u talking about dummy, I own this page. I invented it. Furthermore I have done ALL of the contributions, I just wasnt logged in like 20% of the time that I wasnt ULing images. Trace my IP & u will see ;-) Also if you want to make a generous capital donation to his lordship, please do through my paypal account on ebay.--Nuklear 17:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eep . OK, it's clearly a real chemical, discussed (e.g.) here.  We therefore should have an article on it.  My suggestion: protect the article ASAP, and keep .  It seems to be undergoing current vandalism. JulesH 14:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't think that there is currently vandalism underway per se, it seems to me that the author is writing an article with a slight slant against the Chinese. It deserves an article, but I do not think it should be protected. mrholybrain 's talk 14:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Slant against the chinese, insertions of absolute incoherent nonsense ("hochemicals", by the way, seems to be a British "herbal medicine" distributor, interested in opioids for their potential application as pain killers, or so they claim).  I don't deny that there's stuff going on that doesn't look, on its face, as if it's vandalism.  But I don't know enough about the subject to be sure.  And I see stuff that does look vandalism mixed in with it.  Much of the information being added seems to be related to experimental use of the substance as a narcotic and is in some cases clearly original research ("The author has personally bioassayed (±)-OMF2 but is disappointed that not more physical data was made available").  I think User:Nuklear needs to be prevented from editing this page while it is sorted out, but whether that should be by protecting the page or blocking the user, I don't know.  Anyway, changing my !vote to speedy keep.  Wikipedia should clearly have an article on this topic, and here isn't the place to discuss what is & isn't going on in the editing of it.  Thus, I will now go and suggest an adminsitrator looks into it over at WP:AN/I. JulesH 16:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.