Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oi-ist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Krimpet (talk) 07:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Oi-ist

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

lol BLATANT original research and frankly not even funny. Kez 00:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly some horrible combination of original research, neologisms. --Haemo 01:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete origanl research and neologism, not verifiable and not notable also.--Dacium 01:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I have nothing else to say about it. +A.0u 02:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JuJube 02:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete complete nonsense. Editing M a n i a c 03:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, because interesting. --172.162.65.72 03:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Maxamegalon2000 05:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatantly stupid. And not even funny, like nomination said. Jmlk17 05:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per Dacium. Sr13 (T|C) ER 06:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.