Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oilfight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mind matrix  03:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Oilfight
Does not meet WP:WEB, barely exceeds WP:CSD for db-empty. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a web directory. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 00:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 00:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

I believe this article should not be deleted. It is informative. Other websites have their own wiki's as well for information on their sites. If this one is deleted. All must be deleted. [User: thewird] December 25th, 2005

It is my opinion that this should not be deleted for the reasons shown by thewird as well as the fact that KoC clone games are an important thing of note when discussing Kings of Chaos as well as MMO's in general, and that no other such KoC clones are represented in the wikipedia. [User: funkywizard] December 25th, 2005.


 * Delete per nom. If KoC clones are important when discussing KoC, then that deserves to go in the article. IMO, the single sentence mentioned there is enough to say that. If any of the clones are notable in themselves - by having a large userbase, some kind of media interest, or a high Alexa rating (142,000 is a long way from the WP:WEB guideline of 10,000). I would recommend anyone trying to save the article read the guideline in question, as well as the seciont on meatpuppets in Sock Puppets, and maybe even tracking down an AfD that went in favour of a website's entry to see how an argument should be organised. Confusing Manifestation 08:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Ifnord 16:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete gamecruft, no evidence it is either notable or ever will be. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 17:11, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertising. TheRingess 01:02, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - got popular through spaming. Guess what are they doing now? Renata3 15:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.