Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ok, You're Right


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. I think redirecting this to Before I Self Destruct would be a good idea but that's now an editorial decision. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Ok, You're Right

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not properly source (its all primary sources) and to be frank its a from a mixtape. Its a promotional single from the album but its chart position is not notable as it is impossible to source. there really is no need for this page considering it won't grow in size and much of the information is unsourced. Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, I suggest do not delete the page, this have information, just missing a few things.--Eduardofoxx13 (talk) 20:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * comment, part of notability includes size... this article is a stub and unlikely to grow in size and is therefore WP:NSONGS states such articles shouldnt be created.Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Keep: The song is the first single from 50's fourth album, the song also appeared on a mixtape, but that was never intended to be in place of on the album. The album was delayed several times, so the single is notable in that it was eagerly anticipated by fans. The article also shows it was number one on a billboard chart. Not being sourced is not a reason to delete an article especially when said sources could easily be contained. Furthermore compared to many other song related wiki article the article seems about decent length. All in all I say we should keep this one.--Deathawk (talk) 05:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * comment anticipation for a song is not enoguh to make it notable. neither is saying its compared to other songs its a decent length per WP:Other studd exists. the sources in this article are poor (mainly self-published) and the article is unlikely to grow in size. furthermore simply being released is not enough for notability. being number on bubbling under chart is not even a great chart achievement and since its unsourced it should be removed from the article. bubbling under charts cannot even be sourced credibly without a billboard chart subscription. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:14, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.