Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma City bombing conspiracy theories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete per failure of WP:RS and WP:NOR. -- Nish kid 64 00:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Oklahoma City bombing conspiracy theories
First deletion reason: Fails to assert notability by reference to any reliable source – not one reliable source cited, and the article has been up for over a year! Undue weight. Entirely original research. Conspiracy cruft failing WP:RS, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. Morton devonshire 02:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per nom. Of 20 bullet points, only one is cited and that one cites a source of <= Blog caliber. --Dual Freq 03:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nomination. Crockspot 03:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable Alex Jones conspiracy cruft. --Aude (talk) 03:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. alpha Chimp (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Conspiracy theory articles should cover conspiracy theories as phenomena, not advocate for them, and this one isn't much of a phenomenon. Gazpacho 05:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails both WP:NPOV & WP:NOR Jpe|ob 15:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom. Englishnerd 15:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can be recreated later if reliable sources exist, none of which do now (but doubtful, as I can't even recall ever having heard of such for this). · XP  · 19:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arbusto 00:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Cruft. PEr nom--Tbeatty 01:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Just too poorly cited, and probably can't be fixed. No objection to re-creation of a proper article though with notable cites. Derex 02:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Derex. CWC (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The following was added by at the top of this page and has been moved and partially wikified by CWC (talk) 07:51, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Who are you people to delete all these items ! NO Censorship! you haven't made your case just by quoting codes what are the specifics? How does it fail to met the standards ?
 * Do not delete!
 * Keep- It contains 3 items refrenced as well as a book and you have made no attempt to add to the content. Quit with your deletist agender!
 * Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Oklahoma_City_bombing_conspiracy_theories"


 * Deleteper nom--Peephole 08:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tom Harrison Talk 13:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Let’s let the grand jury from the Fed’s help us here: This grand jury's report says that there is no credible evidence that anyone other than McVeigh and Nichols was involved, that there is no credible evidence that the government or the ATF or any government agencies had prior knowledge that a bombing would occur; that was one of the popular conspiracy theories. Delete per nom.  JungleCat    talk / contrib  14:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, mystifying that it's survived this long without NPoV editing and improvement.--Rosicrucian 15:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.