Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Statehood Stamp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Oklahoma Statehood Stamp

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable U.S. commemorative postage stamp issue. This stamp had no artistic, commercial or historic importance attached to it. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete No evidence of notability. Lets  drink Tea 01:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to have generated sufficient publicity and is kept in specialized encyclopedias:  StampNews - a specialty magazine newspaper CBS another newspaper, and Oklahoma state government. I think these, just from the first page of a google search is more than is required to meet WP:N by any of our standards. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:06, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a directory of every stamp or coin ever made. The stamp is not notable among stamps. 24.211.34.78 (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The Oklahoma Statehood Stamp is Notable because it is part of a series of USPS stamps commemorating the entry of new states into the Union; Alaska's and Oregon's stamps went on sale in January 2009  and Hawaii's stamp is scheduled to go on sale in the summer of 2009 . ProfessorPaul (talk) 02:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets RS standards. -- Storm  Rider  03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It meets the general notability guideline. Sources indicate what time it was for sale, why it was released, who painted it and pretty much any other detail you could wish to know about a stamp. I consider the fact was released as a commemorative stamp to celebrate the state as it having historical importance. - Mgm|(talk) 08:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable among stamps. (If there is an article on the series of stamps, then merge.)--Dmol (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.