Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okorie Okorocha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. lifebaka++ 00:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Okorie Okorocha

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Article does not assert notability using reliable, third-party sources. VG &#x260E; 02:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * DELETE A search find the attorney, but does not find any special notability per WP:Notability (persons).  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Notice to closing admin: Please relist this AfD so it runs for another 5 days. Apparently some users were deterred from participating in it because it showed as a red link for a couple of days on the article page, even though the link itself was correct and worked. Further details on this ANI thread. Thanks, VG &#x260E; 02:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 02:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources that are already on the article don't show notability of this person. At most, he has represented some notable cases, but the cases were not notable because he has represented them, and I don't see that he is represented on the sources as a notable figure. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. No need to re-list this one, the consensus is clear.  Get rid of it! JBsupreme (talk) 04:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The nominator requested a relist because of this. See comment above. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lawyers do not become notable just for doing the job they are paid to do. Mentions in sources are trivial (not about him, only about cases).10:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.