Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oksana Grigorieva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 01:52, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Oksana Grigorieva

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability; see NOTINHERITED. —Emufarmers(T/C) 19:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Info is already in the article about the father of her son and an unlikely redirect target. Edward321 (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable although this has made her 445% more popular than last week on IMDB. Drawn Some (talk) 03:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What has? —Emufarmers(T/C) 22:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, to clarify my statement: IMDB has a "secret" method of determining the popularity (on the IMDB website) of films and actors and shows the percent change of popularity increase or decrease from the prior week.  Someone like this who is so little viewed on the IMDB website can have their popularity increase significantly just by having a few people click on the link in the Wikipedia article to check it out when it comes up for deletion. In other words, if only two people looked at her page last week and four did this week, it might show a 100% increase in popularity.  I apologize, it was a snarky way of saying she isn't very notable.Drawn Some (talk) 22:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree with your point or even your snarkiness in principle, but in this instance the increase in her STARmeter&trade; rating is probably due to the current media gossip about her personal life, not our AfD. ;-) —Emufarmers(T/C) 01:03, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That may well be, I must admit I am not familiar with her! Drawn Some (talk) 01:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. No assertion of notability, and notability is not inherited. Dawn Bard (talk) 20:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.