Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okuda Shoji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lookout Air Raids. This solution is preferred to deletion since it keeps the edit history intact.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Okuda Shoji

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has had no sources since 2007. A search for sources finds passing mention in articles on the air raid (,, , etc.), but none provide more than passing mention. The Japanese Wiki article on the raid doesn't even mention his full name, and other searches in Japanese fail to come up with his full name in kanji. The information in this article is basically given in The Lookout Air Raid article, so this article is unnecessary. Fails especially the "significant coverage" part of WP:GNG. They only criterion in WP:SOLDIER it might possibly pass is number 6, but no sources indicate how important he was to the mission. Michitaro (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Michitaro (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. No sourcing to verify any of the claims, and notability has not been demonstrated. --DAJF (talk) 02:18, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to either Lookout Air Raids or Nobuo Fujita. A reasonable search term as a participant, however insufficent notability for a stand-alone article. - The Bushranger One ping only 12:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.