Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ol' Widowmaker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123    (e)  02:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Ol' Widowmaker
This seems to be flat out vanity. The product described isn't found in the top ten of Google in its own term, and does not seem to be notable by any stretch of the imagination. -- Jjjsixsix (t)/(c) @ 01:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 01:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete vanirt article → A z a  Toth 01:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, blatant vanity. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 01:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Con  Dem Talk 01:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, also not big on one-paragraph entries. Danny Lilithborne 02:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Brewers are all notable.  Brews, however, are not.  If the brewer had an article this could be merged there (anyone want to make one?) but since there is none, this stub must be deleted. NTK 03:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delte per above -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 03:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Metamagician3000 04:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete cool name though &rArr;    SWAT Jester   [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]]  Ready    Aim    Fire!  06:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable enough. If we have an article about the brewer, this can be briefly mentioned there. J I P  | Talk 08:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gimme citations re praise for sweetness, etc.  On second thoughts, don't. Colonel Tom 13:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without confirmation from the company this article is merely original%u2014oh wait, I agree with Colonel Tom and NTK &mdash;WAvegetarian&bull; CONTRIBUTIONS TALK &bull; EMAIL &bull; 15:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.