Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oladeji Olatunji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Oladeji Olatunji

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not sure why this was accepted as it was created by a known sock (upe, etc...) and was previously AFD'd and merged to his older brother. I see no evidence at this point that there is significant enough coverage to warrant an actual article and there is little to no change in those sources. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't really see much significant coverage. Most of the sources look to be mostly unreliable. Fails WP:GNG. Bythebooklibrary (talk) 01:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge with KSI (entertainer). Encyclopaedic content (ie the Awards section) can easily fit within a section of the KSI article. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 23:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Little confused, . That's about his brother. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 02:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge per 1292simon.--Rpclod (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per Chrissymad.--Rpclod (talk) 15:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , Again, I ask, why? That article is about his brother, not him.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge Hi Chrissymad. The merge suggestion was an attempt to salvage something out of the article. However, I can see the arguments for deleting, and think that is also an acceptable outcome. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 12:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete do not merge, do not redirect. Redirecting a BLP to a BLP is idiotic and dangerous, and is one of the absolute worst habits we have on Wikipedia. Merging would all but require we keep a redirect to sustain the history for attribution. If there is anything worth including in the brother article, it likely doesn't need a merge. Re: why this should be deleted? It was created by a UPE sock farm to promote the man. It should have been G5'd a year ago. No need to even look at notability. The content and the history is actively harmful to Wikipedia, and preserving it would go against everything in our core policies: we do not create potential BLP violations (redirecting a BLP to a BLP), and we do not store advertising in histories for people to come along and just reuse. Delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I accepted it at WP:AFC and copyedited it, because he has 8.7 million followers, which is much more than the 250k notabilty number. How do you check if it has been created by known sock? If it is dodgy, it goes. scope_creep (talk)
 * Delete and Salt with no redirect. scope_creep (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.