Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olayinka Thomas-Ogboja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Olayinka Thomas-Ogboja

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not currently contain any reliable source. I can't find any reliable coverage. Most links present are "About Us" primary sources of a company Darreg (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article looks like advertising. Spumuq (talk) 08:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:55, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * delete I have a feeling that this is very well-meaning, getting African women into Wikipedia. However, the references are all blog posts (which may be all that is available) and are promotional in nature. The photograph also appears on one of the blog posts and may well be a copyright violation - it was uploaded by the creator of the article, but there is no information regarding rights. LaMona (talk) 21:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.