Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Berkeley Beagles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Old Berkeley Beagles

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Clearly fails WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Directory listings and trivial mentions are nowhere near enough. Newspaper archive search produced nothing useful. AusLondonder (talk) 12:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organizations,  and England. AusLondonder (talk) 12:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  15:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete for similar reasons to those I gave for the Isle of Wight Foxhounds article. We need to slim down our excessive coverage of minor Anglosphere minutiae.  RobinCarmody (talk) 23:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete not notable. However, I do not agree with the reasoning above. We do not need to slim down our excessive coverage of minor Anglosphere minutiae, but rather increase coverage of non-anglosphere topics. --Bduke (talk) 04:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.