Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old German Baptist Brethren (New Conference)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Old German Baptist Brethren. Any relevant content can be merged from the history.  Sandstein  06:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Old German Baptist Brethren (New Conference)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable enough for own article -- merge with Old German Baptist Brethren. Jrtayloriv (talk) 18:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC) There are quite a few external links, and it discussion of the New Conference is in danger of dominating the history section of the OGBB page, (which is out of proportion to it's importance historically.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brechbill123 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A single reference is not sufficient to establish notability. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  --  N / A  0  00:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The reference is from 1995, so obviously not talking about this New Conference. It could be notable, as small denominations often are, but it will be hard to find third party sources. No need to merge - the Old German Baptist Brethren article has more than enough on this subject, though it is entirely unreferenced. StAnselm (talk) 01:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * RETAIN Added references from two New Conference publications this last year, they're polemic but facts can be gleaned from them. I agree with Anselm, this article helps to remove extraneous New Conference material from the Old German Baptist Brethren Article, which it is unbalancing at present--BUT I argue for retention.204.42.21.188 (talk) 22:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.42.21.188 (talk) 22:38, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge back to Old German Baptist Brethren, or rather redirect, since a similar text is there (in "Recent Developments") already. OGGB appears to result from a schism in 1881 and only has 56 churches, all in USA.  The New Conference must be an even smaller denomination.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:27, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to Old German Baptist Brethren. Fails WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per above and in that full disambiguating names of sourced denoms of any size should be retained as redirects at minimum. JJB 01:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.