Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Mill Inn & Spa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. NAC. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 23:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Old Mill Inn & Spa
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Left this for a good long time to be cleaned up. Do not believe there is any notability here. Fritzpoll (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete - could not find reliable sources to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 15:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Weak keep - someone with better google-fu than I found what appears to be decent sources.--Boffob (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.   -- RayAYang (talk) 15:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:CORP. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 16:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to find anything to make me feel this should stay. Paste Talk 17:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. The Rolling Camel (talk) 20:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with Fritzpoll.  Enigma  message 19:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm going to poke around, but I have to believe that sources can be found. The building is historically significant - designated as a heritage site - and the restaurant was originally opened in 1914. Mlaffs (talk) 03:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep – Just now I have added five references and expanded the stub. There is enough there for the general notability guideline, including articles about the building in the Toronto Star, the National Post, and Flare magazine. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 05:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * As nominator, I concur that sufficient sources have been added for historical notability of the site, and I ask the closing admin to weigh my nominating statement accordingly. I still think further discussion is merited and useful, so will not withdraw the nom Fritzpoll (talk) 09:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I'd like to see a more specific source on the history of the mill but I'm convinced that the history of the place combined with sources now provided give this a pass for a start for the article. Double Blue  (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article now looks reasonably well sourced. JulesH (talk) 22:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Old Mill is a notable historic building in Toronto. The article could use work, of course. Here's a reference for some of the history of the site: . Also, it's better known without the "inn & spa". Suggest that the article be retitled and Old Mill Inn & Spa be redirected to it. TheFeds 02:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Vastly improved as compared to time of AfD Nomination. Has a Historical Site designation as well as several items mentioned to maintain Notability. All supported by Cites. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  07:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -- the building is a Toronto Heritage Property. (And we need to make this red link a blue link and put buildings into that category, but I'm getting ahead of myself.)  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 22:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.