Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old People Brown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 16:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Old People Brown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am not sure that this concept exists. Even the "source" cited in the article does not mention it at all. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G3: Vandalism. Kolbasz (talk) 12:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

I see the reasoning you take in building your argument for the deletion of this article. However, this is truly phenomenon and your critique may be targeted in the wrong direction. The issue then is that the article will need to be more substantiated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky201 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete – #B9764F is indeed brown. But according to No original research, we need evidence that someone else has already used the name "Old People Brown". We can't just make names up ourselves. – Margin1522 (talk) 18:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as racial slur. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. No relevant sources have been provided, and I couldn't find any either. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. -- Calidum  06:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.