Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Older men-younger women


 * doesn't seem like an encyclopedia topic delete (rewrite is good, keep) - Mattingly23
 * Tend to agree. Even if you were interested in the subject, how would you ever find it? Deb 19:59, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree. This is neither necessary nor anything new. Aranel 20:01, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * in other news, bears have been found to dispose of waste body matter in highly arboreous areas. Delete. Keep --Ianb 20:05, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Oh dear. Delete . Fire Star 20:35, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep; rewritten (consider disregarding previous votes). I've moved the article to Age disparity in sexual relationships; I think this topic is perfectly encyclopedic &mdash; even if it is a little obvious. Many thanks to Denni for contributing much of the new content, which I took from his rewrite of May-december romance (also on VfD). &bull; Benc &bull; 21:21, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Fire Star 22:10, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep: Not the most elegant solutions, but it works to keep a number of topics.  We all need to pitch in. Geogre 00:14, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep the new page, & the redirects; the news page does have useful info & is encyclopedic. -FZ 15:55, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep the new page, now it looks better and encyclopedic Radoneme 18:01, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)