Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oldominion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  12:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Oldominion

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable hip hop crew, fails WP:MUSIC -- lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 04:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

oldmic —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.82.140 (talk) 05:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Comment if deleted, redirect to Old Dominion as plausible typo 70.51.10.188 (talk) 05:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: its no typo. "Oldominion" is the spelling of the group's name. I cannot speak toward WP:Music, but my search found stuff on them.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Group has made no substantial contribution to hip-hop music and should therefore be deleted. Group has also not generated any significant media coverage (most sources trivial).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment My apologies for this relist. I was on the wrong log page --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  01:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Searching fails to bring up any non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article has few references, does not explain why the subject is notable, and is mostly lists of information (WP:TRIVIA). Nat682 (talk) 01:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - btw nothing from MySpace should be linked to from Wikipedia Nat682 (talk) 02:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Myspace is not notable-- Free way  8  03:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.