Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ole Martin Moen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Ole Martin Moen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

163 citations in Google Scholar; 8 library holdings according to Worldcat Identities. In other words, WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:ACADEMIC. His political career was a brief stint as one of the 37 members of the municipal council of Øvre Eiker, a small municipality in Norway. (Note that the Norwegian Wikipedia edition has much lower notability standards for academics than WP:ACADEMIC here and traditionally accepted anyone with a PhD and sometimes even doctoral students.) Bjerrebæk (talk) 11:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Bjerrebæk (talk) 11:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment. I agree that there is not sufficient impact for most of the WP:NPROF criteria, but what about this as evidence of meeting WP:NPROF? AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Moen seems to be just above the bar for WP:NPROF, and "Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." But I'm open to changing my mind here. Jmill1806 (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep There are reliable sources on the article that indicate this person is notable. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.