Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleander (band)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 10:51, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

Oleander (band)
Band vanity, notability not established. This article should be shot so there's room for a new one. Radiant! 13:48, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite. It's a terrible article (and a copyvio from here, to boot) but they're quite notable.  A Google search for 'Oleander band' returns nearly ninety thousand hits.  I appreciate the noble effort to clear Wikipedia of cruft, Radiant!, but it wouldn't hurt to do a quick Google. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 16:01, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, point taken :) We seem to be agreed though that the article can't stand like this. Radiant! 16:14, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 23:34, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I rewrote it to remove the copyvio, so keep. Tuf-Kat 00:54, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. -Sean Curtin 01:18, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes Wikimusic project guide guidelines, with to albums one at least with a major label. Well-done Tuf-kat. Capitalistroadster 10:24, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, spurious notability. JamesBurns 10:55, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.