Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleg Maisenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. I've ignored the Kerkill as illegible.  Syn  ergy 12:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Oleg Maisenberg

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced for over two years, fails verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  18:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - there's a lot of News hits for him unfortunately a lot are in pay-per-view or need translation . NYT reviews are the most accessible I've found so far,  subject is clearly notable and content appears able to be verified -Hunting dog (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per hunting dog.Nrswanson (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep same as the previous AfD by Stifle, do some research before assuming there's nothing out there. Rather than deleting b/c it isn't referenced, perhaps provide the reference instead. Wikiwikikid (talk) 15:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Why to Keep, it is unreferenced for over two years --Puttyschool (talk) 17:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Is there a policy that says two years unreferenced = delete? The fact of the matter is that deletion is easier than citing, but if there is a legitimate claim to notability then they should be kept for their encyclopedic value.  The person who notices the lack of reference would be more constructive to the WP Community by finding the references and citing it than simply by deleting it. Wikiwikikid (talk) 19:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Kerkill per WP:V. --Forego (talk) 20:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep half a minute on Amazon brings up 38 recordings with which he's involved as soloist, named performer or subject. Here he is reviewed at classicstoday.com (who admittedly refer to him as a "sort-of-famous" artist); here he is on the cover of Steinway's own magazine in Austria.  I found these refs in less than 2 minutes and will add to the article when and if time allows, but as an actively recording classical soloist and practising music academic I can't see how he could possibly not satisfy WP:N.   Ka renjc 21:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, article has been improved and sourced WRT nom, passes WP:BIO. -- Amalthea Talk 12:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.