Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksander Dermanskyj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Oleksander Dermanskyj

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Unsourced BLP since 2008, no reliable secondary sources. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Fails WP:BIO; I can't even find anything in Lexis. Ironholds (talk) 20:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No secondary sources. Kevin (talk) 04:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, unable to find coverage in any reliable sources independent of the subject. Does not meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. — J04n(talk page) 13:48, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep To what extent is this discussion driven by ignorance and laziness? The guy is Ukrainian, he writes in Ukrainian, but did anyone search for the Ukrainian term Дерманський Олександр Степанович. Did anyone check the Ukrainian page, three sources are listed and the claims of awards won would indicate pass per WP:GNG?  The article is not fantastic and I'm also too lazy to attempt to penetrate the sources in that language, but that's a bad deletion rationale. MrCleanOut (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, fails WP:BIO. Seems that doesn't have any coverage in reliable sources, thus cannot be considered very notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 17:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I strongly encourage people to look at these before pushing more for deletion of this article. --Slon02 (talk) 04:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't read Cyrillic languages very well (although I'm attempting to learn Russian), but at least one of them appears to be an unreliable source. Do we have any way of judging the reliability of that information? The mere presence of an article on another Wiki is not, in itself, conclusive or supportive proof of the subject's notability (although it may indicate their relative importance. Ironholds (talk) 07:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.