Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Kuzmik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Oleksandr Kuzmik

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Footballer who fails GNG and the spirit of NFOOTBALL, his career being limited to 2 games on the Ukrainian third tier Geschichte (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - unfortunately I don't have access to any offline Ukrainian sources but internet searches of the Ukrainian name provided don't seem to come back with anything useful. Given that he barely crosses the line for the weak presumption of notability provided by NFOOTBALL with his third tier Ukrainian appearances and, furthermore, given that even more contemporary footballers with a similar professional record have been found to fail GNG, I am inclined to vote delete. If, of course, better sourcing is found, the article should stay. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.