Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Miroshnikov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 01:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Oleksandr Miroshnikov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by the content translation tool. A very talented man, no doubt, but notable? Black Kite (talk) 00:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Not much out there covering the subject but I suggest we hold off on deleting since there is an "under construction" tag and the page might be improved with sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The article says he has had solo exhibitions at major museums and therefore meets WP:ARTIST, and the article currently contains a reference. I will support deleting if it can be shown that the claims are false. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - A widely Exhibited artist.Masterknighted (talk) 15:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Draft instead as they are not collections, exhibitions are not as convincing so we can wait for better if available thusbehy I suggest Draft. SwisterTwister   talk  01:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Reply please note,, that WP:ARTIST 4 (b) says "has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition" at "several notable galleries or museums." Solo exhibitions at notable museums constitute major evidence of the notability of an artist, more so than being held in a permanent collection, which often means sitting in a warehouse out of public view. Cullen328   Let's discuss it  03:09, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, without prejudice to recreation. Blow it up and start over. The sourcing of this article is hopeless. There is no such thing as the "Complete Gentleman Memorial Fund Awards of the House of Fabergé". Miroshnikov may be notable, but there is nothing in this article worth saving. Mduvekot (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  07:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 21:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.