Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Yaroslavskyi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  17:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Oleksandr Yaroslavskyi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This person is not the actual subject of in-depth coverage by multiple reliable sources: he fails WP:GNG. None of the claims are particularly noteworthy, and none have ample third-party coverage. JFHJr (㊟) 00:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Comment There appears to be a well-cited article on the Ukrainian Wikipedia:. Thriley (talk) 02:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ukraine.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Most of the article in Ukrainian is largely unsourced. Ostalgia (talk) 12:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Kill it with fire. Unsourced article waxing lyrical about an oligarch, looks like a PR release, probably paid editing to boot. Found it quite shocking when I first saw it. Ostalgia (talk) 12:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Thriley (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment This article from the Kyiv Post is a nice summary that could be used to build out the article: . Thriley (talk) 19:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It's mostly an interview - as far as secondary sources go this is as primary as it gets. I do not think this is acceptable for a BLP. Ostalgia (talk) 19:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per significant coverage in the following sources:
 * Two significant secondary-source profiles in Ukrainian and one in English is more than enough to establish notability -- we don't even have to consider news coverage, which is prolific and ongoing as can be seen from the sources in the Ukrainian Wikipedia. Jfire (talk) 19:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Two significant secondary-source profiles in Ukrainian and one in English is more than enough to establish notability -- we don't even have to consider news coverage, which is prolific and ongoing as can be seen from the sources in the Ukrainian Wikipedia. Jfire (talk) 19:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.