Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Busuioc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Olga Busuioc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The lack of independent sources kind of does this in. Yeah, we have some links to some awards the subject has won - the only problem is that those point to the sites of the people handing out the awards. Not exactly independent sourcing there. Plus, we have an admission that this is a promotional autobiography. I would suggest to Miss Busuioc that she first wait to be covered by independent sources and perhaps allow others to write her autobiography at that point. - Biruitorul Talk 22:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your message, what kind of independent sources do you mean? May be I can ask for confirmation from other persons, or how to make my biography on wikipedia realistic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldstallion (talk • contribs) 08:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Goldstallion (and others, so folks know the question's been addressed), just left you a note over on your talk page to give some explanation of what Wikipedia considers legitimate sources, and point you toward more reading on the topic. Hope that helps! Welcome! Innisfree987 (talk) 20:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment. This article very much shows why we strongly discourage people from writing Wikipedia articles about themselves. A Wikipedia article is not supposed to be a CV and, at least currently, this article decidedly is one. As it happens, it is an extremely good CV for an operatic soprano who is not yet 30, but it not only does not clearly demonstrate the subjec's notabililty but actually hides the achievements that could make her notable in Wikipedia terms among far more that definitely do not. For instance, competition prizes are undoubtedly a useful way for up-and-coming musicians to demonstrate their quality, but very few of them help at all towards notabiity - in fact, the few that do are so well-known that it would be pointless to describe them as prestigious. What do usually count are leading roles with world-famous opera companies - the subject's recent Mimi in La Boheme with Los Angeles Opera may well count (but I would prefer to defer to editors from WikiProject Opera on that point) and has certainly generated quite a bit of notice. It is quite possible that her Cio Cio San at the Teatro Comunale di Bologna would also count towards notability, and even if it does not, I would be surprised if the subject does not do enough within the next two or three years ro make her notable. But I am not sure that she is yet. PWilkinson (talk) 21:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Had to remove a large chuck of text as it was copyright violation. The references do not indicate any notability yet. It needs concert reviews, possible recordings and less emphasis on any competitions where it is unclear if she has won them or simply participated. Karst (talk) 16:48, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable operatic soprano.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still nothing substantially enough to suggest independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  20:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I see that this has been hanging around a while already but I'd appreciate seeing one more relist to see if sourcing can establish notability--at the moment I'm genuinely unsure. If it doesn't, to me this seems like a candidate for a soft delete, so the entry is easily retrievable if sources and a motivated editor materialize. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist &mdash; Music1201  talk  16:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  16:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.