Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Medynich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:20, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Olga Medynich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Nothing popular Russian actress. A couple of supporting roles and participation in a humorous show.--Kirill Samredny (talk) 06:56, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 13.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:29, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:29, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 07:29, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Did you try Russian sources or any other language besides English? Keep per source one, source 2, and source 3. SL93 (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * So what? Biographical references of databases.--Kirill Samredny (talk) 01:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * So biographies do not count as significant coverage nowadays? Prove to me that they cover any celebrity, such as some sort of statement on the websites, or my mind can't be changed. SL93 (talk) 01:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep how is this not significant coverage? Which documents a dozen or so movies and multiple TV series. This is in stark contrast to both the nominators statement. Seems to be a WP:BEFORE failure that could have been avoided by looking at some of the other language versions of this article. Nfitz (talk) 01:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep sources exist. Antrocent (&#9835;&#9836;) 01:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Hi, article has a lot of different sources. 🌝Lucas🌞B🌎1991 (talk) 21:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.