Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Poutchkova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep Nominator regrets nomination, all other votes to keep. Sam Vimes | Address me 07:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Olga Poutchkova
The page contains a bare minimum of information, and unlike other pages, the topic of the page is a little known topic on which too much of information cannot be found.I feel it would be best if this article was to be deleted.Thank You. Doctor Evil 20:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd be inclined to think anyone who makes it to a final match against Martina Hingis would be notable, but I don't follow tennis that closely. Fan-1967 20:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, she meets WP:BIO plain and simple. "too much of information cannot be found"? What about the 148,000 Google hits? Punkmorten 21:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Very notable, per Punkmorten. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - see above. SportsAddicted 23:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Noted in the top 100 female tennis players in the world (and at least as high as 65th) in the WTA rankings on four national/international sport sites (with about 4 minutes of surfing). -- MarcoTolo 23:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Expanded into a decent article by me now, just needs some copy-editing. SportsAddicted 05:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * CommentYes, I am so sorry.The article looks very respectable now and should definitely be kept(thanks to SportsAddicted).I was wrong in saying that it needed to be deleted. I should have listed it as a stub.Please accept my apologiesDoctor Evil 07:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.