Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olgaon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep The result was keep. Bruxton (talk) 12:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Olgaon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

the article is very short and only has one reference on it. 1keyhole (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 01:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be a village with census data so should pass WP:GEOLAND.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. (I came here from the ARS listing.) I agree with Crouch, Swale that the census data make it pass GEOLAND. Having a small population, and being, at present, a short page, do not prevent it from being notable for our purposes. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep As per the editor Crouch, Swale. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep small population in the village, but passes WP:GEOLAND#1-2. Lightburst (talk) 13:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.