Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olive 8


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (And no further details on the green roof emerged.) Geschichte (talk) 08:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Olive 8

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is nothing notable about this building and it fails the following requirement per WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Wikiwriter700 (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:06, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep one floor short of a Skyscraper. Notable building housing notable businesses. Passes WP:GEOFEAT social, economic, or architectural importance Lightburst (talk) 20:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * delete I am quite dubious about forty stories as a bright line of notability, but even in Seattle this building is not remarkable. According to our own list it is only the 25th tallest building in the city, and that list shows over a dozen under construction of similar or greater height. This building, and all the other hotels that have been nominated of late, need to satisfy notablility the old-fashioned WP:GNG, which the sources given certainly do not meet. Mangoe (talk) 04:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - There does not appear to be anything innately notable about this unremarkable building, and there is no real coverage of it outside basic statistics. LIghtburst cites WP:GEOFEAT, but the remainder of the guideline that he quotes says "but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability", which does not seem to exist for this structure.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Mild keep Could be notable for the green roof feature, otherwise a 10ish year old skyscraper with no particular architectural features/heritage listing. Would require many more details on the green roof feature to be kept. Oaktree b (talk) 03:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:GEOFEAT. Whether or not it is a "skyscraper" is irrelevant, as there is no SN giving skyscrapers notability. Onel 5969  TT me 23:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.