Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vocaloid 3. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Oliver (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Voice for a voice synthesis software. It's not clear from the sources cited - which do not appear reliable or independent - how this is notable separately from the software Vocaloid.  Sandstein  11:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:28, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Software.   Sandstein   11:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * A redirect to Vocaloid 3, where it's mentioned, is a reasonable alternative to deletion, but I haven't been able to find any independent reliable sources that discuss it in in depth. As an aside, there are quite a few articles at Template:Vocaloid that seem to suffer from similar issues: I suppose some might be notable enough for stand-alone articles, but most would probably benefit from being blanked-and-redirected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Vocaloid 3, but I think a better redirect title would be Oliver (vocaloid) rather than Oliver (software). SWinxy (talk) 19:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.