Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Céleste


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Oliver Céleste

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of meeting notability guidelines as per WP:MUSICBIO. Lack of references. Rizhopper (talk) 14:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Subject lacks notability. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 14:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing on Google/Google News to suggest news coverage and nothing in the article appears to pass the MUSICBIO threshold.  A  Train ''talk 15:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as has released through a major record label as California Records is part of Sony Music so has a claim to pass WP:NMUSIC (only one criteria needed) agree that more references are needed Atlantic306 (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment on 's argument: WP:NMUSIC says "has released two or more albums on a major record label" -- it seems like Mr Celeste has released one album on California Records, and said label doesn't appear to be part of Sony Music. In fact, the label doesn't seem to turn up on Google at all. What am I missing here?  A  Train ''talk 16:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Apologies for wrong spelling as it is Calitonia records, will check its part of Sony Music later Atlantic306 (talk) 16:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't checked properly, but I think there might be some sleight-of-hand in that statement – I think it might refer to Céleste releasing his videos through VEVO, which is owned by Sony. Richard3120 (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * you may be right as am not finding anything about Catilonia records, have emailed sonymusic uk asking them about Catilonia and whether Celeste is one of Sony's artists Atlantic306 (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Simply put, the article lacks references to back up any claim. Re: the Keep vote: Although awaiting user Atlantic306 research, my hunch is that the little-known Catalonia Record’s connection to Sony is that they are a customer of Sony’s digitial distribution services, rather than being an actual part of Sony Music. I think all of us who have spent time on musician related AfD have come across pages that feature an independent label under a larger label’s umbrella and mistake that for some kind or noteworthy connection only to discover the small label pays the larger label for a service, and in doing so claims “to be part of …(fill in the blank).” I could be wrong in this instance, but even so the 2 release criteria for WP:NMUSIC has yet to be met. ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.