Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Henry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per SNOW. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Oliver Henry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Disambig with only one bluelink and two redlinks. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * A new article has been created which alters my opinion (see below). . *Redirect to O. Henry. Occasionally Oliver was used as pen name. Thincat (talk) 09:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devoke water  11:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to O. Henry and add a hatnote on that article pointing to Sentinel-class cutter. — Shelf Skewed  Talk  13:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, now that one of the articles has been created.— Shelf Skewed  Talk  15:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the blue link then per as a WP:CHEAP  solution here. I have no objection to a hatnote per ShelfSkewed,  but I’m not certain it’s necessary. I presume at least one of the red links is anticipated to become an article once the ship finishes construction.  If that happens the page can easily be restored. -2pou (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Bzzzt! I believe this disambiguation page was completely compliant with Disambiguation, and that this nomination was completely out of bounds.
 * I started Oliver Henry (USCG), this morning. Geo Swan (talk) 14:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Disambiguate somehow Now Oliver Henry (USCG) has been created, and it looks good to me, the coastguard is probably the main topic. Yes, the nomination was never good. Thincat (talk) 15:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as a clearly proper disambiguation page. I was inclined to close this as a speedy keep on this basis, but will participate in the discussion to make this outcome clearer for the next admin who has the same thought. BD2412  T 18:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as per BD and events that have transpired since nom. Cheers! -- puddleglum  2.0  20:14, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.