Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC) P.S. Since this was the third time the article was deleted, I also salted the title. --MelanieN (talk) 01:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I find no independent, substantial coverage in reliable sources, and his political office was within one of the 23 districts into which Vienna is divided. I searched under and. Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. If he was one of the city councillors of Vienna as a whole it would be different, but he's only a councillor within one of the city's many districts. No other especially significant posts that I can see. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I still suspect this person may in fact be notable, and in particular that there may be significant sources in German. But those sources, if they exist, are not before us, and the ones presented so far do not establish notability. DES (talk) 22:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The article does not make any claim of notability that would constitute an automatic keep under either WP:NPOL or WP:AUTHOR, and is not sourced nearly well enough to satisfy WP:GNG — it's sourced exclusively to raw tables of election results, and even those tables express the results solely in terms of party, while not actually naming any individual candidates at all. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if proper reliable sourcing can be piled onto his writing. Bearcat (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I continue to believe the subject does not meet the general notability guidelines, or the ones for politicians. I did search in German sources and there is some material out there, I don't think it's enough to warrant inclusion. The original version of the article was a puffed-up resume obviously created by the subject, but that's neither here nor there. I'd be happy to reverse my !vote if someone can come up with something more tangible than resume material. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete unsourced BLP, district council member in one of the districts of Vienna, fails WP:NPOL, the four refs in the article show district election lists/data but don't talk about the subject, it's a name in a list in three cases. Kraxler (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.