Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Trevena (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Oliver Trevena
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted at AfD in 2014, but the present article is different enough from the previous article to preclude deletion under CSD G4. Subject is a minor actor and television host, nothing to indicate he satisfies either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Safiel (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Some-time host of segments of an internet reality show; occasional appearances on other shows, but minor characters or single episodes. May be teetering on the borderline of notability, but currently on the wrong side. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - Subject is covered in reliable sources but not necessarily notable. Meatsgains (talk) 21:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete One of numerous ex-pat aspiring actors in Hollywood, therefore fail WP:NACTOR. E! Online source does not explain how he is notable, all it says is he was engaged with some former child TV star and how their engagement lasted a year, therefore WP:NOTINHERITED, also attending and hosting showbiz parties isn't going to make this subject notable. Donnie Park (talk) 22:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It's possible to explain a delete vote without going out of your way to attack/belittle the subject, . (small time hanger-on ex-pat aspiring actors who never make it as big doesn't pass WP:NPA) --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 09:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 09:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NACTOR. Pretty much per above delete !votes. Best case WP:TOOSOON worst case COI/PROMO. J bh  Talk  13:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as looking at his list of works says it all, no signs of any actual independent notability here at all. Notifying 1st AfDers and .  SwisterTwister   talk  17:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see nothing in the way of coverage that would put this across the bar of notability. -- Whpq (talk) 19:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep-eh, looks like a notable-enough actor, but needs a COI notice since article was created/and or heavily edited by a paid-editor imo.TeeVeeed (talk) 19:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Not much seems to have changed from the previous AfD, no new notability since 2014. Am I missing anything? Coderzombie (talk) 22:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps only the tenacity and indefatigable spirit of the paid publicist who recreated the article. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If the closer sees they two articles are significantly similar and there are COI/PAID/PROMO issues then the title should be WP:SALTed so we do not end up wasting volunteer time here again in a few months. WP:AFC is not that great a burden if the subject becomes notable. J bh  Talk  23:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.