Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Fialkow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Olivia Fialkow

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Some coverage in Boston Magazine but lacks the significant coverage required to establish notability. RadioFan (talk) 18:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no clear notability. --Oscarthecat (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete There are some sources here, but I don't think that a few people paying attention to her fashion would qualify as establishing notability. The last sentence, unsourced, says: "Olivia has used her blogging fame to raise awareness on issues such as eco-conscious consumerism and the ethical treatment of workers, both within and outside of the fashion industry." but no source is given.  If a reliable source were given for that assertion (i.e. not a blog or self-published source) I might change my recommendation to a keep, because it would show that this person has actually done something and that it has been noted.  Cazort (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Sorry, even a million trivial mentions of saving all of humanity from destruction by asteroid collision doesn't make someone notable under Wikipedia guidelines. The standard we use is significant in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. The Boston Magazine and Supermelon sources are the closest thing here to that, they both are fairly bloggy, especially Supermelon, certainly not a structured journalism environment with editors and fact-checkers, etc. Close but no banana.  Fails WP:BIO due to lack of significant in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Drawn Some (talk) 01:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Trivial, trivial, trivial - Vartanza (talk) 05:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.