Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Mojica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete --Steve (Stephen)talk 08:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Olivia Mojica

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Hardly notable American Idol "semi-finalist" (I can't tell when she was eliminated, but she was not even in the top 12) now attracting some minor attention (one article in Variety and some blogs) with the announcement of a release of a sex tape. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ 17:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * That doesn't mean you can just go around deleting everything you feel is unnecessary, it is still factual information, and with some of the stuff that is on wikipedia it is not much worse right now. This really doesn't fall under any of the reasons for deletion, and again, it is relevant information. I say unless a page is a blatent hoax, contains gross misinformation, or any of the items under the Reasons for deletion page, it should be kept. Just because there isn't a large page on this, does not give anyone the grounds to say that it is unneeded or never viewed, it is not your server space, leave the page be, keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.111.163.37 (talk • contribs)
 * To the anonymous user above: Calm down and please take a look at What Wikipedia is not, as well as Notability. The latter says: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and each other." Olivia Mojica happens to have had very little significant coverage outside of Idol, which is why we nominated her page for deletion. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, so we don't need to list every single thing that exists on Wikipedia. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom -- AI contestants aren't inherently notable. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. If the sex tape garners serious media coverage, she may qualify under WP:BIO, but right now I think she falls short, and since there's nothing much else to say about her, there's no need for an article. | Mr. Darcy talk 20:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. This article has been on my watchlist for some time (after a random article capture), and after sourcing the existing statements, there was no other useful information to put into the article. There still isn't, but the article seems to be a recurrent target of commercial spam ("where to buy this video") and the occasional bout of vandalism. Risker 22:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete failed talent show contestant who has veered into porn? Nope, still not notable.  Lankiveil 02:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.