Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Physical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mr.Z-man 17:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Olivia Physical

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable compilation, unreferenced, fails WP:N ukexpat (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete Unreferenced, no sources seem to exist. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- ukexpat (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of context or showing of notability. Keep based on Deor's research, which shows notability beyond doubt, as well as a source for the evidence. Nice work, D.   I have to admit, I got a laugh out of the typo in this one (a "copilation video").  I'm sure that it was referring to a compilation, but it could probably be enjoyed during something else.  And it probably has been. Mandsford (talk) 21:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a compilation by a notable artist. The nominator did not explain why the article failed notability requirements and Arguments to avoid in deletion debates clearly states that there should be an attempt to fix surmountable problems (like a lack of references; see WP:NOTCLEANUP for more detail). - Mgm|(talk) 21:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  19:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. According to this (to say nothing of a WP article), this won a Grammy for Video of the Year. Does that make it notable? Deor (talk) 20:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed it does. That's enough to change my !vote, and I think that it's now an obvious keep.  Good work. Mandsford (talk) 01:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I guess I'll have to say keep then, too. In a hasty review of WP:NM and WP:NF I didn't see anything specifically about videos like this one. When I get a chance, I'll add a mention of the award to the article. Deor (talk) 15:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.