Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Waldriff (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus again. However, since this is an unsourced BLP I'm going to move it to the incubator Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Article Incubator/Olivia Waldriff

Olivia Waldriff
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

as per my previous nomination. whilst she has had a few roles, i can't find evidence of significant roles as required by WP:ENT. gnews makes passing mentions. LibStar (talk) 08:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Sorry stub that needs some care. Her career is easy to verify and a little research finds more than just "passing mentions". For instance, the Toronto Star article of March 2008 represents significant coverage and is not just a passing mention. It could/should be used to begin citing the article, yes... but simply needing work is rarely cause for deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per MichaelQSchmidt. Chester Markel (talk) 01:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:JUSTAVOTE. LibStar (talk) 02:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.